Can we be more explicit on the required AI disclosure requirements for posts? It seems like 80% of the time people seem to think the required discourse is about their post, not the project they are promoting. This sub is getting hammered with vibe coded slop and while not all vibe coded projects are bad... most of them are and they aren't being disclosed often enough.
 | Got this 32GB VRAM card (basically 2x WX7100 in one card) for 100 USD. Gigasteal. I want to be running local LLMs for the most part but i was wondering what else can i do with it? Do you have any other uses [link] [comments] |
 | Most self-hosting security advice is just about the basics - don't expose ports directly to the internet and use containers for basic isolation Beyond that what level of security do you actually enforce? Do you monitor what your apps are doing in the background, like tracking outbound network traffic or checking file access on the host? When updating, do you just let it auto-pull or read the release notes for breaking changes or inspect source code and dependencies before updating? [link] [comments] |
I am looking hardware to host my first selfhosted system. My use planning is to host data like a NAS, my own password vault, an adblock like pi hole, vpn, and maybe explore with some project to host some automate, and data monitoring apps. In a medium future I want acquire a better independient device to set up a self hosted IA server with some harness, but I said I want to have them sepparated.
My maths to hardware request are enough with 2tb of storage, 16gb RAM, and a N150 cpu. I saw in this Reddit so much hate to umbrel hardware, but I am seeing now the home model with 2 tb of storage from 599€ and the chineese alternative overprice this.
Am I wrong with my assumptions?
Login![[link]](https://i.redd.it/y9lg1vxg7pmh1.jpeg){kind=link}
![[link]](https://i.redd.it/vobpruk49pmh1.png){kind=link}