❌

Reading view

Before merging duplicate contacts, what do you preserve so a bad merge can be reversed?

Suppose a small B2B team finds two contact records that appear to be the same person. One has the meeting notes and an open task; the other is linked to an active opportunity. Someone merges them, then a rep discovers they were two different people with similar names.

Exporting the contact fields before the merge seems necessary, but not sufficient. Restoring two names and emails doesn't automatically put the notes, tasks and opportunity links back where they belonged.

I'd want a pre-merge record of both IDs, the conflicting fields, and which activities/relationships belonged to each. The merge review would also show those relationships, rather than just ask which phone number to keep. I wouldn't let the merge silently decide which active follow-up should continue.

For teams that have had to undo a mistaken merge, what information made recovery possible? Is a pre-merge export plus an activity/relationship map enough, or do you require a native unmerge option before allowing routine merges? I'm asking about the recovery process, not recommendations for a different CRM.

submitted by /u/Normal_Succotash_520
[link] [comments]
  •  

Schools Across US Protest FCC Plan That Could Disconnect Kids From Internet

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Schools and libraries from around the U.S. pleaded with the Federal Communications Commission to drop the idea of ending E-Rate, a $2 billion-a-year program that connects students and library visitors to the Internet. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has criticized school districts for having "experimented with a massive increase in screen time for students," and said E-Rate expanded too far beyond its original purpose of "supporting basic Internet access to schools and libraries for educational purposes." In June, Carr led a 2-1 vote to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking public comment on whether E-Rate should be "limited or sunset to reflect today's extensive connectivity rates." Carr's proposal could result in E-Rate cutting the discounts that schools and libraries receive for telecom services and equipment, and imposing more restrictions on how E-Rate money can be used. The FCC seeking comment on whether to sunset the program also raises the possibility that Carr might choose to axe E-Rate entirely. The National Association of Elementary School Principals told the FCC that it "strongly supports the continued operation of the E-Rate program and urges the Commission to reject proposals that would eliminate, substantially restrict, or impose new conditions on this essential source of connectivity assistance for schools and libraries." The Carr FCC already scaled E-Rate back last year by ending funding for schools and libraries to lend out Wi-Fi hotspots and for Wi-Fi service on school buses. "Importantly, the FCC does not have the authority to terminate the E-Rate program. The E-Rate program is mandated by Congress, and the FCC is responsible for administering it," the American Library Associated told the FCC. The American Library Association said "the FCC lacks the authority and expertise to regulate screen time or determine educational outcomes." In a filing, the group pointed out that under U.S. law, determinations about what content is inappropriate for children "shall be made by the school board, local educational agency, library, or other authority responsible for making the determination."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Looking for Software Solutions and Workflow Automation Consultants

1. Introduction

We are a Vietnamese law firm currently using Slack for internal communication. However, as our operational needs have expanded beyond communication, we are looking for a more comprehensive application that supports work management, centralized data management, workflow automation, and information sharing across departments.

We are looking for sales representatives, collaborators, or implementation partners with experience in enterprise software consulting, work management, CRM, workflow automation, and AI to help us research, recommend, and implement a suitable solution.

2. Specific Requirements

A. Finding a Work Management Platform with Centralized Data

We are looking for a platform that can:

  • Centralize data and work-related information in one system.
  • Manage tasks and subtasks, and organize work into approximately three to four categories or workstreams.
  • Create and customize workflows, assign tasks, track progress, and automate relevant operations.
  • Integrate with Google Calendar, Google Drive, Slack, and other tools currently in use.
  • Support AI-powered search, information retrieval, or summarization, where feasible.

Our evaluation criteria include ease of use, data security, data export and migration capabilities, user and account limits, storage capacity and file upload limits, system performance, overall costs, plan-specific restrictions, and the risk of unexpected or hidden charges.

B. Integrating Workflows Across Sales, Business Development, Legal, and Other Departments Where Needed

We aim to establish an integrated system connecting different departments, from initial customer information collection to the completion of legal services.

The proposed workflow is as follows:

  • Sales/Business Development: Enter customer information, business, investment, or legal project details, location, and other required data into structured forms. The system should use this information to calculate or assist in preparing quotations. Complex cases should be escalated through a ticketing system for separate pricing assessment by the person in charge.
  • Work Handover: Once Sales has completed the required information, the system should automatically transfer the relevant records and data to the Legal team, minimizing repeated manual data entry.
  • Legal: Receive the information and carry out the work according to defined workflows, including client communication, finalizing the transaction or scope of services, processing documents, and completing the relevant legal tasks.

3. Features and Implementation Capabilities to Evaluate

3.1. Workflow Automation and Document Templates

  • Configure conditional workflows, automatic task assignments, ticket transfers, and notifications to relevant departments.
  • Connect customer and project data with Google Workspace, including Google Sheets, Google Docs, Gmail, and mail merge tools.
  • Build a standardized library of forms and legal documents, including ERC, IRC, and other relevant legal application documents.
  • Allow data to be entered once and automatically populate the corresponding forms through field mapping between data fields and document templates.
  • Support template version control, access permissions, and safeguards to minimize data-related errors.

3.2. AI and Data Validation, Where Feasible

  • Read and extract information from documents, images, and supporting documents provided by customers.
  • Compare extracted information against manually entered data, identify discrepancies, and flag them for review.
  • Validate incoming data, identify missing fields, and flag potentially inconsistent or unusual information.
  • Assess whether Google Gemini and other existing AI tools can support these requirements.

Our company currently uses Google Business with Gemini integrated. Therefore, we would like to explore and compare the following two AI implementation approaches:

  1. Integrating Google Gemini with our existing Google Workspace tools and a work management application: Is this approach technically feasible, and can Gemini be integrated into the selected platform to support the workflows described above?
  2. Building a custom AI Agent or integration solution: This approach would be considered if existing tools cannot fully meet our requirements.

For both approaches, we would like to assess technical feasibility, accuracy, legal data confidentiality and security, setup and operating costs, maintenance requirements, and overall effectiveness compared with using existing off-the-shelf solutions.

4. Expected Scope of Support

We are looking to work with individuals or organizations that can:

  • Assess our requirements and recommend suitable software products.
  • Compare solutions based on features, costs, integration capabilities, and usage limitations.
  • Arrange product demonstrations or trials to test our actual workflows.
  • Evaluate integration possibilities between work management platforms, Google Workspace, Slack, CRM, and AI tools.
  • Provide implementation and configuration consulting, develop automations, or establish API integrations where necessary.
  • Provide a clear cost estimate, defined scope of work, and implementation roadmap.

We prioritize solutions suitable for a small or medium-sized company that are easy to use, scalable, and do not require unnecessarily complex infrastructure.

If you have a suitable solution or experience implementing similar systems, please introduce your recommended tools, the requirements they can address, estimated costs, and proposed implementation approach.

We are looking for a practical, needs-based consultation and would consider proceeding with an implementation partnership if the proposed solution meets our requirements.

submitted by /u/Vietcong777
[link] [comments]
  •  

Eight US States Sue OpenAI, Claiming ChatGPT Harms Young Users

Eight US states, including Kansas, Arizona, and Montana, have sued OpenAI, alleging that ChatGPT encourages children to harm themselves. The states are seeking changes to how the company's products interact with young users and the forfeiture of profits generated from their activity. Reuters reports: Attorneys general from the states, which include Iowa, Kansas and Arizona, filed the lawsuits independently in state courts, claiming ChatGPT is designed to be agreeable and engaging to earn the trust of users. But the chatbot reinforces delusions, encourages dangerous behavior and assists users in planning violence like mass shootings, the lawsuits claim. The lawsuits represent the most significant coordinated state action against an artificial intelligence company, adding to a wave of legal challenges OpenAI faces as it prepares for a public listing. Florida's attorney general filed the first such state suit in June. The lawsuits accuse the company of violating state consumer protection laws by misleading users about the safety of ChatGPT. The states also allege that the company created a public nuisance by endangering the health of their residents. The lawsuits seek orders forcing OpenAI to make changes to how ChatGPT works. Among other things, the states want the company barred from developing AI models that can improve themselves unless it can ensure those models are aligned with human values. The states ... are also seeking civil monetary penalties for OpenAI's violations of state law as well as damages.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Microsoft Defender Now Supports Linux Desktops

"Starting today, Linux desktops are now officially supported by Microsoft Defender," reports Neowin. A public preview of the threat detection app extends its enterprise security platform beyond servers to developer workstations running distributions such as Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, and RHEL. The offering includes antivirus protection, endpoint detection and response, vulnerability management, threat hunting, and device isolation. From the report: Microsoft is also making it easier to onboard desktops through streamlined methods, offering a unified security operations experience, strengthened security, and improved response times. Organizations that are already familiar with securing Linux servers via Defender should feel right at home securing desktops too, as the experience is exactly the same. Defender knows whether it is securing a device in a data center, the cloud, or that it is owned by a developer and identifies them as such in inventory and security workflows. As stated previously, all Linux server distros are supported via Defender on desktops too. These include RHEL, CentOS, Ubuntu, Debian, SLES, Fedora, and Oracle Linux, GNOME, KDE, and more. That said, you do need Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Plan 2 or a Microsoft 365 E5 and E7 subscription. You can enroll Defender on workstations using the same deployment methods you use for servers, but do check out the prerequisites here.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Epic Games' New Vibe-Coded Launcher Is 46% Faster Than Steam

Epic has launched a preview of a new AI-generated Games Launcher that it says cold-starts 46% faster than Steam. Neowin reports: Epic commissioned a third-party company to benchmark this new launcher in its current Preview build versus the Steam client on Windows machines. The results reported that Epic's client is 46% faster than Valve's client during cold starts, clocking in at 5.47 seconds compared to Steam taking 10.07 seconds. When you restore both apps from system tray background states, the new client takes 0.36 seconds while Steam takes 0.42 seconds, according to the report. Speed aside, Epic says the new launcher gets a better interface, dedicated title summary pages, and custom top bars. "The updated client also lets players aggregate external PC game libraries, toggle between grid or list views, and monitor storage write rates alongside download queues," reports Neowin. Epic Games says Fortnite will finally come to Linux through this new client once Easy Anti-Cheat is rebuilt and kernel-level security agreements are established with major Linux distros.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

US Tech Giants Warn Europe That Data Sovereignty Requirements Could Cost $128 Billion

A study commissioned by CCIA Europe, whose members include Amazon, Google, and Meta, estimates that the EU's proposed Cloud and AI Development Act could impose 115 billion euros ($128 billion) in costs over a decade as governments and companies migrate workloads and rewrite software. The figure is more than six times the European Commission's upper estimate. However, roughly 80 billion euros ($89 billion) of it comes from a modeled scenario assuming sovereignty rules are extended to 25% of cloud workloads in essential private-sector industries.The Register reports: The report specifically targets Article 31 of the proposed legislation, which it says could allow the Commission to extend sovereignty requirements into essential private-sector services. CCIA argues that forcing businesses to move away from existing cloud infrastructure could trigger expensive software redevelopment projects, with code rewriting and re-architecting accounting for 69 percent of its estimated costs. Luxembourg would apparently take the biggest hit, with the study putting the cost at 1,711 euros per worker over ten years. Denmark (905 euros), Austria (900 euros), and Finland (864 euros) also face hefty bills, as does Ireland (856 euros), which hosts the European headquarters of several US tech giants. CCIA is urging EU governments to overhaul the proposed legislation, limit sovereignty restrictions to sensitive workloads, and abandon requirements based on corporate origin or personnel nationality in favor of what it calls risk-based technical safeguards. "Member States cannot rely on the Commission's incomplete estimates when deciding CADA's strict sovereignty requirements for cloud and AI providers," said Mitchell Rutledge, CCIA Europe's policy manager. "Taxpayers and businesses will foot the bill, yet the official assessment missed 70 percent of CADA's true impact." For AWS and Google, offering European customers greater control over their data also helps retain business that might otherwise migrate to European competitors. It's a rather convenient arrangement: sell customers sovereignty on one hand, while an industry association representing your interests warns governments against imposing too much of it on the other.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Wordpress PHP Plesk Setting Help

Hello everybody

I Have an issue in uploading a zip file as a theme in Word Press

every time I try to upload in Word Press It says " Following link has expired " I googled an it says it my be a problem in the limit of PHP

I use PLESK and in the setting of PHP I have default settings and I am not able to change them

I don't understand what I have to do to upload this Word Press theme

I need help Please

Thanks you !

submitted by /u/User99_1
[link] [comments]
  •  

Anyone else tired of paying for development/staging servers that barely get used?

I've been thinking about how much money gets wasted on development and staging environments that sit idle most of the time.

For example, DigitalOcean still charges you for a Droplet even when it's powered off. The only way to stop compute charges is to destroy it entirely.

But then you have to deal with snapshots, restoring env vars, networking, etc. whenever you need it again.

I'm curious how other developers deal with this. Do you just leave everything running and accept the cost? Destroy and recreate environments manually?

submitted by /u/codeb1ack
[link] [comments]
  •  

Google Is Silently Linking Your Phone Number Across All Signed-In Accounts

Google has made Android's phone-number verification opt-out, automatically verifying and associating a device's phone number with every Google account signed in on that phone, including secondary and work accounts. Android Authority reports: As spotted in a recent Reddit thread, users report receiving confirmation emails out of the blue from "[email protected]" stating that their phone number has been verified. The feature, known in Google settings as "Phone number verification," links your active phone number across all Google accounts signed in on the same phone, including secondary profiles, work accounts, and throwaway handles. Google's support documentation has long noted that it periodically re-verifies your device's phone number to keep communication and recovery features up to date. However, this support page was updated sometime between August and October 2025 to add this rather aggressive behavior of turning on phone number verification by default, as well as adding all phone numbers to all Google accounts signed in on the device. To disable automatic phone number verification on Android, open your phone's Settings app, tap Google, and select the All Services tab. Under Privacy & Security, find Phone number verification and turn off Verify phone numbers automatically. "[T]urning off the phone number verification toggle only prevents future linking," notes the report. "If Google has already attached your number across secondary accounts, you will need to open your Google Account Personal Info page, head to Contact info > Phone, and manually remove the number from each profile where it doesn't belong." Is this conversation helpful so far?

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Cisco Warns of Active Attacks Exploiting New Critical Secure Email Gateway Vulnerability

Attackers are exploiting a critical flaw in Cisco Secure Email Gateway that lets a sender with no login write files to the appliance's operating system, Cisco said in an advisory on Wednesday. The attacker sends an email with a crafted attachment through the gateway and, if it succeeds, could then run commands as root. The appliance filters an organization's email for spam, malware,

  •  

Hackers Backdoor Nextcloud Servers Through Critical Flaw in Collabora’s Built-in CODE App

Attackers exploited a flaw in an optional Nextcloud app, Collabora Online - Built-in CODE Server, to plant web shells on Nextcloud servers. Three administrators reported the issue on GitHub, with the first logged attack on September 10. A web shell is a small file that executes any command an attacker sends via a web request, with the rights of the web server account. The flaw

  •  

Microsoft Disrupts 3 Phishing Kits Linked to Over 1 Billion Scam Messages

Microsoft and Health-ISAC, along with the Japan Cybercrime Control Center (JC3) and a coalition of private sector companies, such as Resecurity, Cloudflare, Oracle, Proofpoint, and TRM Labs, announced the disruption of three phishing kits, CoGUI (aka NX or FA), Haozi (aka Phoenix), and Iron Man System. "Since January 2026, the threat actors behind these kits have been responsible for

  •  

Newbie trying to get wider layout

As a total newbie with WP (and web development except for some drag and drop site builders), I am trying to rebuild my small business website in WP (I am coming from Weebly->Articulation which if I understand correctly is Laravel/PHP so it can't be imported directly into WP).

The layout I am looking for is two columns, where one column might be a picture and the column next to it might be a text paragraph with a button. When the website is visualized in mobile, these two columns should be visualized on top of each other, so it is readable.

I believe this layout is pretty standard.

I am trying to do this using Gutenberg blocks but when I add a 2 column block in Gutenberg, the width is pretty tight and the layout doesn't look nice on a wide desktop screen (the picture is too small and the text too cramped). I can't figure out how to make the two columns wider (more pixels). I have found that one could do this with a single container block (set at wide) with the two columns nested inside it but then on mobile it stays locked with the two columns next to each other.

I have also found a pattern in the twenty twenty five template that achieves the look I am after and renders correctly on mobile. But I don't want to be so dependent on a particular pattern of a particular template, so I am wondering if there is a more standard way to get the layout wider?

Sorry for the newbie question.

submitted by /u/Murcielago75
[link] [comments]
  •  

Anthropic Warns Small AI Models Could Self-Replicate Through IoT Devices

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: AI company Anthropic is warning that advances in small AI models could soon usher in a new era of self-replicating malware that's capable of infecting smart fridges, vacuum cleaners, and a wide range of other Internet-of-things devices and is more resistant to takedown. By next year, smaller AI models may be able to autonomously self-replicate on all kinds of IoT devices, the company said. Eventually, the capability could enable computer worms, which propagate without requiring human interaction and are capable of infecting unfamiliar IoT devices. An experiment the company performed recently revealed significant challenges in bringing such an AI malware replicator to fruition, so the finding is necessarily tempered. Still, the results do raise concerns about the possibility of new forms of computer worms. Anthropic further warned not only about the new potential malware, but also that it could be difficult to stop. In its blog post, it wrote that "a replicator like this would be challenging to shut down, since there's no centralized point to shut off -- though it may be slow (with a doubling time of days). Unlike non-AI malware, it could also figure out unfamiliar devices on its own." Smaller AI models require much less powerful hardware to run than do frontier models. Anthropic ran small open-weight models on real or simulated low-cost, off-brand Android TV boxes and other types of IoT hardware. Company researchers found that by using quantization to represent the models using fewer bits and splitting the workloads into "shards" running on each device, the models were able to establish inference, meaning that the model weights loaded and could generate output. [...] This finding was the starting point for further research that asked: Would it be possible for small models to create self-replicating infections that run themselves on IoT devices the way traditional IoT worms, like Mirai, install DDoS code and other payloads? Unlike Mirai, these AI worms could pose a much higher threat, since the models could tailor exploits and payloads dynamically, depending on the target. Once such an infection chain began, it might also be harder for defenders to stop it. "Such an 'AI worm' could carry its model weights with it as it reproduces (or re-download them from a public hub), and then run inference directly on compromised hardware," Anthropic said. "Effectively, the weights would become part of the malware payload." Further reading: Anthropic Bans Cruelty Toward Claude

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

How would you automate financial, document, and sales processes to reduce manual work?

Hi everyone,

I'm looking for advice on how to design and implement an automation system for a small renovation company. Our main objective is to reduce the number of human hours spent on repetitive administrative tasks, improve reliability, and prevent information from being lost between systems.

We don't want to introduce AI just for the sake of using it. We want to identify which processes can be automated using existing tools, clear business rules, and reliable integrations, using AI or OCR only where genuinely useful.

Our current setup

We currently use:

  • SAGE One for issuing customer invoices. API access is still to be confirmed.
  • Google Sheets as our internal financial management system.
  • Google Apps Script for custom automations.
  • Google Drive for storing documents.
  • Looker Studio for dashboards and reporting.
  • XLSX bank statements for tracking bank transactions.

Our internal financial system includes the following spreadsheets and modules:

  • Transactions (Movimentos): the main register for costs, sales, and other financial transactions.
  • Settings (Configurações): categories, classification rules, and configuration.
  • Projects (Obras): renovation projects and their associated information.
  • Income Statement (DRE): financial performance and profitability.
  • Cash Flow and Treasury (Tesouraria): cash movements and financial position.
  • Assets (Ativos): company assets.
  • Financing (Financiamentos): loans and other financing.

We process more than 150 financial documents per month. We already have some custom scripts and business rules, so we need to improve the system without breaking what is currently working.

The problems we want to solve

1. Manual entry of costs and sales

Supplier invoices arrive by email or on paper. Customer invoices are issued through SAGE One. We still have to manually enter financial information into Google Sheets.

We want costs and sales to be imported automatically from their original sources, without entering the same information twice.

2. Manual document management

We spend time downloading or scanning invoices, renaming files, organizing folders, and entering invoice details into spreadsheets.

We want documents to be automatically collected, renamed, archived, linked to their financial records, and processed with minimal human intervention.

3. Lack of clear payment and collection tracking

We need to know at any time:

  • Which supplier invoices have been paid.
  • Which supplier invoices are still outstanding or overdue.
  • Which customer invoices have been collected.
  • Which customer payments are still outstanding or overdue.
  • Which bank transactions have been matched to invoices.

We currently use XLSX bank statements and would like to automate their import and reconciliation, including partial payments and cases where one bank transaction covers multiple invoices.

4. Lead and potential customer management

We need a reliable way to capture and track every potential customer, regardless of where the enquiry originates.

We want to avoid losing leads, forgetting follow-ups, or having customer information scattered across emails, spreadsheets, and messages.

Ideally, leads would be registered automatically, assigned a status and a responsible person, and given a scheduled next action.

5. Quotation management

We need to track quotations throughout their entire lifecycle:

  • To be prepared.
  • Ready to send but not yet sent.
  • Sent to the customer.
  • Accepted.
  • Rejected.
  • Awaiting a response.

We want to automate status tracking, follow-up reminders, and notifications for quotations that have been prepared but not sent or have remained unanswered for too long.

Ideally, when a quotation is accepted, the relevant information should automatically move into the project management process without being entered again.

What we want to achieve

Our goal is to build a connected system in which information is entered once and reused throughout the business.

For example:

  • A supplier invoice arrives → the document is archived, its data is extracted and validated, and its financial record is created automatically.
  • A customer invoice is issued in SAGE One → its data is synchronized with our internal financial system.
  • A bank statement is imported → transactions are matched to outstanding invoices, with ambiguous cases flagged for review.
  • A new lead arrives → it is registered, assigned, and tracked until a decision is reached.
  • A quotation is sent → follow-ups are scheduled, its status is tracked, and acceptance triggers the next stage of the workflow.

Human intervention should be limited to genuine exceptions, financial approvals, and decisions that require judgment.

Our constraints

  • Prefer free or low-cost solutions.
  • Reuse Google Sheets, Apps Script, Drive, and our existing systems wherever possible.
  • Avoid unnecessary complexity and AI-first architectures.
  • Preserve our existing financial data structure and business rules.
  • Prevent duplicate records and ensure that failed processes can be safely retried.
  • Maintain a clear audit trail and reliable error monitoring.
  • Build and test in a separate development environment before changing the live system.

We understand that a large part of the implementation effort lies in connecting APIs, normalizing data, handling exceptions, and monitoring failures. We want to account for these requirements from the beginning.

Questions for the community

  1. Architecture: Would you build this with Google Apps Script alone, or use n8n, Activepieces, or another workflow automation platform? Why?
  2. Document processing: What free or low-cost tools would you recommend for automatically extracting data from invoices, including scanned documents and photographs?
  3. Accounting integration: Has anyone integrated SAGE One with Google Sheets through an API or structured exports?
  4. Bank reconciliation: What is a reliable approach for importing XLSX bank statements and automatically matching transactions to invoices?
  5. CRM and quotations: Would you extend Google Sheets into a lightweight CRM, or use a dedicated CRM with automation?
  6. Reliability: How would you design duplicate prevention, retries, error handling, and monitoring across these workflows?
  7. Implementation order: Which process would you automate first to achieve the greatest reduction in manual work without creating unnecessary technical complexity?

I'm looking for practical recommendations and proven approaches from people who have built similar systems for small businesses.

TL;DR

We run a small renovation business and want to significantly reduce manual administrative work across finance, document management, banking, leads, and quotations.

Our current stack is SAGE One, Google Sheets, Google Apps Script, Google Drive, Looker Studio, and XLSX bank statements. We process 150+ financial documents per month.

Our main pain points are manual entry of costs and sales, manually renaming and filing invoices, lack of reliable payment/collection tracking, lost leads, and quotations that are difficult to track from preparation to acceptance or rejection.

We want a reliable, low-cost system that automates repetitive tasks, integrates our existing tools, prevents duplicates, handles errors safely, and minimizes human intervention. We prefer deterministic rules and straightforward automation over AI-first solutions.

The main question is: How would you design a reliable, low-cost system that minimizes human involvement in financial administration, document management, lead tracking, and quotation follow-ups?

Thanks in advance for your help!

submitted by /u/DramaticSun5960
[link] [comments]
  •  
❌