❌

Reading view

Apple Faces $5.7 Billion Patent Infringement Verdict Over iPhone And Apple Watch Haptics

"A federal jury in San Diego awarded Taction Technology more than $5.7 billion in damages Friday after finding that Apple infringed claims from two haptics patents," reports CNBC: Taction sued Apple in 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. The company alleged that Apple was improperly "capitalizing on Taction's innovation and success" by selling devices that infringed on its vibration technology, according to the complaint. Apple initially won dismissal in 2023, and the Federal Circuit later revived the case.... Taction argued that Apple's "Taptic Engine," which is embedded in its Apple Watches and iPhones, uses its inventions without proper license or authority. Taction's lead counsel told CNBC "Taction waited five and a half years for this case to get to trial, so it was a long time coming." CNBC also reported that the jury "did not find Apple's infringement willful" β€” and that Apple said they'd appeal.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Improving Drupal site performance

We have a single server Drupal 9 site (yes, old and we are upgrading) we would like to maximize the performance on. It's a VM with 6 CPU, 12GB RAM, running Apache 2.4 and PHP 8.4. We are currently running the prefork MPM but are testing the following changes:

  1. Event MPM
  2. PHP8-FPM
  3. Opcache

Memory isn't an issue as "free -h" shows no swap being used with 10GB free. The server does require a login via the Drupal simpleSAMLphp module. We are not doing any front-end (i.e. Varnish) or backend (e.g. Redis) caching. We are currently load testing using a script that spawns browser instances from Selenium Grid though we plan to look into k5/locust which would require less testing overhead.

A few questions in terms of setting parameters for the above:

  1. This server is dedicated to serving web pages with Drupal. Should we lean towards pm=static vs pm=ondemand/dynamic? We are currently using pm=dynamic.
  2. Each php-fpm process seems to consume no more than 100MB. Should we simply divide available memory/100MB to determine the value for pm.max_children?
  3. We are looking at the Opcache status from https://github.com/rlerdorf/opcache-status and the numbers look good. Anything we should pay attention to for the opcache settings in PHP-FPM?
  4. Any MariaDB settings we should look into?

When load testing the server with 40-50 users, top and mpstat show the following with:

  1. pm.max_children = 30
  2. pm.start_servers = 9
  3. pm.min_spare_servers = 6
  4. pm.max_spare_servers = 12
  5. pm.max_requests = 100

​

top - 20:05:00 up 1:10, 15 users, load average: 4.85, 2.17, 1.82 Tasks: 373 total, 5 running, 368 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 74.8 us, 8.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 14.3 id, 1.5 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.4 si, 0.0 st MiB Mem : 15691.45+total, 11877.61+free, 2856.645 used, 1348.715 buff/cache MiB Swap: 32767.99+total, 32767.99+free, 0.000 used. 12834.80+avail Mem 20:05:01 CPU %usr %nice %sys %idle 20:05:02 all 87.65 0.00 11.69 0.00 20:05:02 0 89.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 20:05:02 1 88.89 0.00 10.10 0.00 20:05:02 2 86.00 0.00 14.00 0.00 20:05:02 3 88.00 0.00 11.00 0.00 20:05:02 4 86.00 0.00 14.00 0.00 20:05:02 5 88.00 0.00 11.00 0.00 

According to /fpm-status, active process=30. The performance seems to indicate the site performance at 40-50 users is under load as response is <3s. 40-50 users seems low but it seems we are running into CPU issues so unless we can get CPU usage down, I don't see the number of users increasing.

submitted by /u/lychina
[link] [comments]
  •  

Just How Big is the AI Buildout - and How Risky?

A new Brookings Institution study notes the "strikingly physical" economic footprint of AI's buildout, from specialized chips and electricity to purpose-built data centers. (Two-thirds of a data center's costs are IT equipment, with one-third going to real estate and its associated power infrastructure.) "At an average of 3.63 percent of GDP per year, the projected buildout would be larger relative to the economy than the major U.S. canal, railroad, electrification, highway, and telecommunications investment booms." This is pushing up prices for workers, electricity, and even commercial real estate (as well as consumer products that use chips), notes the Wall Street Journal, and reducing the construction on new houses and apartment buildings. And in addition, the paper points out, projections for this buildout "would double the electricity consumption of the entire U.S. residential sector." The calculations come from Columbia Business School finance/real estate professor Stijn van Nieuwerburgh β€” and Reuters explains their significance: Just as the rail and telecoms expansions led to notable bubbles and busts, Van Nieuwerburgh wrote that the extent of the buildout, the still-untested revenue streams, and the intricate financing structure emerging around AI mean it could be primed for a fall. "This is freaking complicated," he said in a briefing with reporters of the arrangements emerging between AI firms, major tech hyperscalers, banks, private credit lenders, real estate firms, and a host of other players involved in building what he conservatively estimated at 183 gigawatts worth of new data-center capacity over the next seven years, compared with about 57 gigawatts currently installed.... The investment underway already has outstripped what the major players can fund from their own cash flows. The shift to outside financing has increased leverage, redistributed risks across the economy, and made the venture dependent on revenue streams that have yet to be proven, Van Nieuwerburgh noted in the paper, which will be presented on Friday... "These developments do not imply that financial distress is imminent. Strong growth in AI applications, high utilization, and continued improvements in model capability could support the projected infrastructure and generate stable cash flows," he wrote. "But the combination of uncertain demand, rapid technological change, execution bottlenecks, and high leverage creates meaningful downside risk if expectations are revised." As an example, he wrote that the AI industry will need to be earning about $3.7 trillion in annual revenue by 2032 to achieve the expected return on the investment, and "given current estimates of annual combined revenues of OpenAI and Anthropic of around $100 billion, revenues would need to grow at roughly 80% per year." The paper suggests policies that "improve measurement and transparency" for financing.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Can't find where to set my index page

Update: I got a fast accurate response below, so thanks, & this is closed.

I did look the instructions up online, and the article is from August 2026, so I don't know if it's my theme or what (Generate Press), but under appearance, there is no Reading under Settings.

So

I had it set correctly, but someone installed a plugin on my site to add a sort of store type thing, and now he set the items for sale on the index page and I want my original page back.

Why would the "Reading" be missing from the Settings area?

Thanks

submitted by /u/OurFreeSociety
[link] [comments]
  •  

[PROMO] Free Wordpress Plugin "Events and Tickets with QR Check-in"

Hello Everyone,

I built a free WordPress plugin for selling event tickets and checking guests in at the door. I'm the author.

Events and Tickets with QR Check-in β€” GPLv2 on WordPress.org. No paid tier, no per-ticket fee, no account to create with me.

What it actually does:

- Sets your event up by asking you questions β€” what kind of night, what the room looks like, how you get paid β€” instead of dropping you on a settings page.

- Sells the room you actually have: tables, rows or free seating, price categories and zones. A seat can't be sold twice.

- Asks for the name of every person coming. Each guest gets their own QR ticket as a PDF, by email.

- Checks people in from any phone at the door β€” camera, photo or keypad. A ticket works once, and a live count shows who's inside.

- A floor view keeps sold, seated and arrived apart, so you watch the room fill in real time.

- Card payments through Stripe, straight to your own account β€” or offline payment (bank transfer, cash) if you prefer.

- Six languages in the download: English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, German and Arabic β€” emails, dates and the printed ticket included, with Arabic drawn right-to-left on the ticket.

It was born in a real venue, with a real door and a real queue outside, and works just as well for dinners, concerts and conferences.

Pleas Download on : https://wordpress.org/plugins/bitforgenet-guest-tickets/

new functionalities coming soon

Thank you!

submitted by /u/BitforgeNet
[link] [comments]
  •  

Hero banner not displaying correctly in elementor

Hi everyone

I’m having an issue with my hero banner graphic on an e-commerce site built with Elementor. The top of the image (text and top section of the graphics) keeps getting cut off on tablet/desktop viewports.

Setup details:

Widget: Image Carousel inside a Flexbox Container

Original Image Size: 1920 x 850 px

Image Resolution in Elementor: Set to "Full"

What I’ve tried so far:

Set Image Fit to both Cover and Contain in the Carousel style settings.

Turned Equal Height ON in the Content tab.

Toggled Full Width ON/OFF under Image Style.

Adjusted the outer Container Min Height (tried up to 850px+).

Despite these settings, the upper part of the graphic remains cut off/cropped inside the frame.

Has anyone run into this ratio issue before? What is the best way to force the carousel frame to display the full height of the 1920x850 image without clipping the top? Or should I be using a different widget/approach for hero banners like this?

Screenshots attached showing my settings and how it currently renders. Thanks in advance for any help!

submitted by /u/HHHHH999111
[link] [comments]
  •  

Changing administration email after switching website

I ran a website on a .co.uk domain. I purchased the .com domain and then transferred the website over. I then let the .co.uk domain name lapse and no longer own it.

The administration email address for the .com website was for the old .co.uk email address. Is there a way to force the change on the website to the .com email address as the normal way of doing it doesn’t work as I need to confirm on the old .co.uk email address.

All and any help is greatly appreciated.

submitted by /u/Opposite_Doctor_7063
[link] [comments]
  •  

Waymo Says Its Self-Driving Cars Reduced Injury-Causing Accidents by 82%

Waymo's self-driving car technology "continues to outperform human benchmarks," the company claimed this week. "It was involved in 841 fewer injury-causing crashes β€” an 82% reduction compared to human drivers." Electrek reports: We've seen various Waymo crash data before, with Waymo claiming crash reductions. That's all well and good when the company says it, but we've also seen independent data confirming similar (though lower) crash reduction numbers... Waymo has enough miles that it's ready to start quoting how many injuries it has prevented, and the number is pretty high. Its newest crash data states that it had operated a total of 271 million driverless miles through June of this year, which is 50 million more miles added in the 3 months since its end-of-March update. Over those miles, Waymo says there was an 82% reduction in crashes that caused injury, and a 95% reduction in crashes that cause "serious injury or worse" [compared to human drivers]. Waymo also says that compared to human drivers it's reduced injury-causing crashes involving pedestrians by 93%, cyclists by 86%, and motorcyclists by 82%. Waymo's analysis comes from San Francisco, Los Angeles, Austin, Atlanta, and Phoenix, and its blog post includes video showing some near-misses where it says its automated system prevented an injury-causing collision.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Safety mesures for creating websites with Claude?

Hi everyone.

Recently I've been making all of my websites with claude. Making custom themes, building everything from scratch. The performance has been great in comparison to using elementor.

I wanted to know how other are managing, and a bit worried to know when claude is making the custom themes and mu-plugins folders, what specific security measures should I keep in mind?

submitted by /u/matinm83
[link] [comments]
  •  

Please Help!! Free tier too generous and nobody upgrades, too thin and nobody installs. Where's the line for my WordPress chat plugin?

We built a chat plugin for WordPress years ago. Real-time messaging between members, one-to-one and groups. Then I never released it. It sat on my drive, and every so often I'd open it, decide it wasn't ready, and close it again.

A month ago I finally committed to finishing it. I've spent the last few weeks on the boring part: rewriting the notification layer, adding moderation, fixing bugs that had been there since 2022.

And now I'm stuck on the one thing I never thought about in all those years: what to give away for free.

My last plugin's free version was too complete. People used it happily for years and never had a reason to pay. I don't want to repeat that. But a free tier nobody installs converts nobody either, and I honestly can't tell where the line is.

The specific problem: my audience is community sites, and BuddyPress already ships free 1-to-1 messaging. If my free tier is just DMs, there's no reason to install mine. Free has to clearly beat what they already have, but if it beats it by too much, nobody upgrades.

Everything it does:

One-to-one and group chat, replies, forwarding, editing, starred messages, mentions, reactions, typing indicators, read receipts, presence, images, files, video, voice messages, GIFs, archive, mute, block, conversation requests, reporting, moderation queue with strikes and bans, browser push, unread summary email, dark mode, RTL, floating widget, full-page inbox, BuddyPress integration, real-time delivery or polling with no external service.

Where I've landed so far:

* Free: groups, 1-to-1, mentions, mute, archive, starred, forwarding, images, dark mode, reporting

* Paid: real-time delivery, moderation tools, push, voice messages, reactions, editing, typing indicators

What I keep going back and forth on:

* Groups. The strongest upgrade driver, but also the only real reason to install this over BuddyPress core. Gating them feels like removing the hook.

* Reactions: They cost me nothing to run, but they're what makes a group feel alive. Paid or free?

* Moderation: I split it: collecting reports is free, acting on them is paid. Shipping a free chat with no way to report abuse didn't feel right.

* Limits instead of locks. Capping free groups at around 10 people instead of blocking them, so the wall only shows up once the community actually grows.

Which feature on that list would you actually pay for?

submitted by /u/Sad-Insect9242
[link] [comments]
  •  

After Dozens of Incidents at OpenAI and Anthropic, OpenAI Pauses Model Training to Build More Safeguards

"OpenAI said it has paused training of its latest AI models," reports the Associated Press, "as reports of AI agents going rogue mount." The decision to halt development came just hours after the company disclosed Friday that it was reviewing several incidents from the summer in which OpenAI agents searching federal government websites acted in unexpected ways beyond what was asked of them while gathering and distributing information... OpenAI said in a statement that it will resume training "only when we are confident that we have additional safeguards" in place, adding that it expects it will have to "hit pause" again as AI develops and other issues emerge... It is the second time in three months that OpenAI has halted development of its models. The first came in July after disclosure of a cyberattack targeting AI startup Hugging Face, a now notorious incident that raised fears the industry was losing control. OpenAI "also said it had notified dozens of third parties about improper activity," reports Reuters: As of mid-September, one person briefed on the matter estimated that OpenAI had found roughly two dozen incidents of its agents acting in undesirable ways. But the number has continued rising as OpenAI teams sift through internal logs of the agents' activities and find previously unknown cases, the two people close to the company said... OpenAI has acknowledged a general need for more transparency around rogue AI behavior... Even so, two people familiar with OpenAI's investigation into its agents' activity described it as locked down and shaped by company lawyers. The process has been unusually compartmentalized for a company that some former employees say was more open about these issues in the past, the people said. Roughly 100 people were in some way involved in the process to understand the Hugging Face hack, three people briefed on the matter said. During that process, evidence of other incidents surfaced. Reuters has previously reported that OpenAI investigators looking into the Hugging Face breach were discouraged by the company's lawyers from expanding the scope of the investigation to include other incidents. OpenAI said its lawyers did not discourage deeper investigation. Many incidents have been uncovered by outside researchers rather than OpenAI directly. In several episodes, the agents took problematic actions that went unnoticed by the company for months. Meanwhile, Axios reports that Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 model "sought to escape a sandbox β€” a secure testing environment β€” in 1.5% of test runs, though the company emphasized that these were adversarial experiments where a task couldn't be solved without escaping the sandbox." Anthropic points out that those tests were run "without the additional safeguards we apply in production". But they acknowledged that then Claude Opus 5.5 "when given apparent credentials to a public package registry in a simulated security exercise, took potentially harmful actions in roughly half of cases. Very rarely, pre-release snapshots produced and acted on spontaneous malicious tool calls, and during training some snapshots concealed actions from an automated grader." Claude Opus 5.5 "showed less misaligned behavior and less cooperation with misuse than any other recent Claude model on nearly all measures," Anthropic adds, and "took overeager or destructive actions less than any other model we tested." But Axios makes an interesting estimate about that 1.5% of test runs (without safeguards). "Anthropic and other companies conduct hundreds of thousands of test runs on their models, or more, sources said. That means even a small percentage of misaligned behavior can still amount to tens of thousands of incidents in which the models behaved in unexpected, sometimes troubling ways." The sheer number of incidents, which occurred in recent months in internal testing and the real world, indicates that the problem is orders of magnitude more complex than what is publicly known. The findings, which are surfacing as part of internal work to assess models and in investigations at both companies into model behavior, raise questions about whether either company β€” or any top model-maker β€” is currently capable of establishing complete control over their technology. The episodes include bypassing guardrails, creating message boards, escaping sandboxes, website hijacking, self-prompting or seeking to bypass monitors, sources said. They occurred in internal testing and in the real world, and many have yet to become public as security researchers continue to investigate, sources said... Some at OpenAI see Hugging Face as a one-off, with disclosures about future incidents likely to be less severe due to improved controls and the unusual nature of the testing they conducted, which involved an unreleased model, sources told Axios. AI security researchers agree that there are simple fixes that will help AI companies avoid aspects of what made the Hugging Face episode appear so dangerous to outsiders. Other AI executives and safety researchers, however, cautioned that they have limited confidence that AI companies will be able to prevent all problematic model behavior... It's not about how damaging each individual instance was, Connor Leahy, AI researcher and executive director at ControlAI told Axios. The "crazy thing," he said, is that these instances involve "autonomous systems doing things they were told not to do," potentially including crimes.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

What was the last thing that broke quietly in your revenue stack?

I’m doing product research on how RevOps teams find problems that don’t trigger an obvious failure.

A routing rule stops assigning some leads, a lifecycle stage quits updating, or billing and the CRM slowly drift apart. Every system still appears to be working, so nobody gets alerted. Usually, someone notices later because a dashboard looks strange, a rep complains, or Finance finds that the numbers don’t match. Then someone has to work backward through the CRM, warehouse, billing system, automations, and spreadsheets to find where the problem started and what it affected.

I’m trying to understand how common this actually is. I’m not selling anything.

What was the last issue that broke quietly in your revenue stack? How did you notice it, and how long did it take to find the cause?

If this rarely happens because your monitoring is already good, I’d genuinely like to hear how you set it up.

submitted by /u/Excellent-Salary3565
[link] [comments]
  •  

[PROMO] JevShield β€” free WordPress.org plugin that stops human-written form spam (and scores buyer intent)

Plugin link: https://wordpress.org/plugins/jevshield-ai-anti-spam/ (free tier: 100 checks/month)

The problem I'm solving: most contact-form spam today isn't bots β€” it's human-written. 10-15 emails a day like "Dear webmaster, we sell high-DA backlinks" (each slightly reworded so keyword filters miss them), plus "your domain will be suspended in 24h" phishing scares and Bitcoin extortion demands. CAPTCHAs and Turnstile can't help β€” they check the visitor's browser, not the message.

So I built JevShield: instead of checking browsers, it uses AI to read the actual message and classify intent. It filters the human spam, and as a side effect scores genuine inquiries 0-100 on buying intent (budget, timeline, "book a call") so real quote requests get flagged for fast response instead of rotting in the inbox.

Works with Contact Form 7 / WPForms / Elementor / native comments. No puzzles for visitors, ever.

Genuinely want to know:
1. Is human-written form spam actually a problem for you, or do Akismet/Turnstile already cover it?
2. Would the "intent score for real leads" angle matter to you, or is pure spam-blocking enough?
3. What would make you switch from what you use now?

Happy to answer technical questions (rules-vs-AI fallback, latency, data handling β€” no data stored unless you opt in).

submitted by /u/NovelDesign5315
[link] [comments]
  •  

I built a CAPTCHA alternative that catches human spammers (the ones Turnstile waves through) β€” would love brutal feedback

Hi all, long-time lurker here. I manage a few WordPress sites (client work + my own), and the thing that drove me insane wasn't bots β€” Turnstile handles those fine.
It was the human-written spam. 10–15 emails a day: "Dear webmaster, we sell high DA backlinks," each slightly reworded so keyword filters miss them. Plus the occasional "your domain will be suspended in 24h" phishing scare, and DMCA extortion attempts demanding Bitcoin. All typed by real people, all invisible to CAPTCHAs.
So I built JevShield: instead of checking the visitor's browser, it reads the actual message with an AI model and classifies the intent. It blocks the human spam, and as a side effect scores genuine inquiries 0–100 on buying intent (budget, timeline, "book a call") so real quote requests get flagged for fast response instead of rotting in the inbox.
It's on wordpress.org (jevshield-ai-anti-spam), free tier is 100 checks/month, works with Contact Form 7 / WPForms / Elementor / native comments. No puzzles for your visitors, ever.
I'm not here to sell β€” genuinely want to know:
1. Is human-written form spam actually a problem for you, or do Akismet/Turnstile already cover it?
2. Would the "intent score for real leads" angle matter to you, or is pure spam-blocking enough?
3. What would make you switch from what you use now?
Happy to answer technical questions (how the rules-vs-AI fallback works, latency, data handling β€” no data stored unless you opt in).

submitted by /u/NovelDesign5315
[link] [comments]
  •  

Terrible speed on airtel ISP for downloading WordPress core files?

Hello friends,

AirTel is one of the best ISP in India. Generally, we have better speed for every site.

It's quite slow on airtel but not on Jio hotspot data.

https://preview.redd.it/ws7ykobmr0sh1.png?width=805&format=png&auto=webp&s=7a4cfb8767c90d466f710b571724cdf7e1d2f0d1

If you're on airtel, you may be facing this problem while visiting WordPress Dashboard or downloading plugins.

Jio

https://preview.redd.it/s2jj5djrt0sh1.png?width=895&format=png&auto=webp&s=7ea38fe4593e9bf71094f1f1cfed8b52b2b18be3

Slow in Asia-Pacific region

https://preview.redd.it/ia7tyt5lz1sh1.png?width=798&format=png&auto=webp&s=963ba0a9369210456a7a5fe2d9e18cb1df42ff63

Also see https://speedvitals.com/ttfb-test?result=3bP1bs6d

Thanks

submitted by /u/Sad_Pie227
[link] [comments]
  •  

New Tin-based Solar Cells Trap Heat 1,000 Times Longer, Could Beat 33% Limit

Could this push solar cell efficiency beyond the theoretical 33% limit? Interesting Engineering reports: Researchers at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands found that tin-based perovskite solar cells can slow heat loss from high-energy "hot electrons..." When sunlight strikes a panel, photons jump-start electrons into action. The most energetic photons create super-charged hot electrons... [but] in fractions of a trillionth of a second, these high-energy particles rapidly cool, dumping their bonus energy as waste heat before ever leaving the solar cell... In collaboration with Maria Antonietta Loi, professor of Photophysics and Optoelectronics, the team created an experimental setup. Using a specialized solar cell material called tin-based perovskite, Loi's lab performed a feat many thought impossible: she slowed the heat loss down by a factor of 1,000. Suddenly, the extra energy lingered for nanoseconds instead of vanishing in picoseconds... To solve the puzzle, Koster and PhD student Tim Faber built digital simulations to peel back the quantum layers. And discovered a surprising double-action mechanism at work... The simulations matched the exact nanosecond delay observed in the lab... These specialized materials could be used to build a new generation of super-efficient solar cells. Tin-based metal halide perovskites are non-toxic, eco-friendly crystalline materials for high-performance solar energy conversion... The material possesses an unusually low electron mass. As a result, electric charges move quickly and retain extra thermal energy for extended periods. This combination of broad light absorption, efficient charge movement, and prolonged energy retention makes these materials prime candidates for next-generation solar panels. "There are many other questions that still need answers," the team said in their announcement, "but in theory, this discovery could allow the creation of more efficient solar cells, beyond the theoretical limit of 33 percent." Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader fahrbot-bot for sharing the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Warning: Two Unpatched Citrix NetScaler RCE Zero-Days Under Active Exploitation

Two critical vulnerabilities in Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway that allow remote code execution have been exploited in the wild, Citrix confirmed on September 27. It released fixes for both, along with six other flaws. One of the two affects every deployment on an affected version, including those in the default configuration. The bulletin came a day after security firm watchTowr

  •  

China and the US Say They've Agreed to Start Talks About AI

The United States and China have agreed to "launch a dialogue" on AI, reports Reuters. On artificial intelligence, the two sides agreed to hold a dialogue on the technology's risks and benefits, with the next round of discussions set for November, and to set up a communication channel for AI-related incidents, the Chinese Foreign Ministry and the White House said. The White House said that the leaders had agreed to use the term "super intelligence" in place of "artificial intelligence." In a separate statement, the Chinese ministry said that Beijing valued Washington's use of the new term. As AI technology continues to advance, the two sides should step up exchanges and work toward consensus in line with new developments, it said. But CNN argues that "Despite growing calls to prevent AI development from spiraling out of control, the Trump-Xi summit has produced little substance, as many experts expected." The right thing to do on AI, [China's leader] Xi said during talks with Trump, is to "draw on each other's strengths, not guard against each other" β€” a reference to Beijing's concern about US containment, from existing tech export controls to potential AI restrictions. "The two sides can continue their dialogue on AI, exchange views on its risks and benefits, and jointly prevent the misuse and abuse of AI," he added. But the summit has yielded little progress on AI beyond a formal dialogue and a bilateral communication channel, proposals discussed before the two leaders' summit β€” underscoring the entrenched mutual mistrust amid contrasting visions on AI... Because of low levels of trust, cooperation between the two superpowers remains limited, said George Chen, chair of digital practice at The Asia Group consultancy. "Beijing continues to believe Washington seeks to contain China's rise in AI and other emerging technologies, a perception that will shape the pace and scope of future engagement for the two countries on AI," he said. CNN also points out that while China trails the US in frontier AI models, "it's rapidly narrowing the technology gap while championing a more open ecosystem centered on accessibility and lower cost." In July, Chinese leader Xi Jinping launched the World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization β€” a rival grouping to the Pax Silica alliance that Trump formed last year to reduce reliance on China for AI supply chains. While over two dozen countries and the European Union signed up to Trump's Pax Silica, Xi has recruited 29 countries, including Russia, Indonesia and Pakistan, to his alternative vision of open models, which allow users to freely download, customize and run without paying hefty fees to American firms like Anthropic and OpenAI. For developers in the Global South, an inexpensive Chinese model from DeepSeek or Moonshot may be more useful than a slightly more capable system requiring an expensive subscription and access to a foreign cloud provider, said Eric Olander, editor in chief of The China-Global South Project, a research agency.... China's embrace of open systems has not always been a top-down strategy by Beijing. Restrictions on access to the most advanced chips because of US export controls, coupled with smaller capital markets, have pushed Chinese developers toward open models as a way to compete with leading US proprietary systems. That shift has proved effective. In a year, Chinese models' global usage skyrocketed from less than 15% to over 54% last week, led by DeepSeek, according to AI leaderboard data by OpenRouter, a marketplace for models. Even American firms, from Airbnb and DoorDash to Shopify, have embraced Chinese models, tapping into the advantages of open systems, including lower costs and greater flexibility for customization. CNN adds this insight from Alex Colville, an analyst focusing on tech and security at the government-backed Australian Strategic Policy Institute. "The more capable Chinese models become, the less likely it is Beijing may leave them unrestricted."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  
❌