Star Trek Turns 60
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
| AI can be stubborn and frustrating. Can Drupal become an AI harness that steers humans and AI, both inside and outside Drupal, toward success, without Drupal losing its openness, stability, and scalability? [link] [comments] |
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Curious how common this actually is outside my own head: how much time do you (or your team) spend re-typing a Jira ticket update into an email or Slack message so a customer knows what's going on with their issue?
I kept hearing this from CSM/support-lead friends — engineering updates a ticket, nothing reaches the customer unless a human relays it, on a delay, inconsistently, and there's no real record afterward of what was promised vs. what shipped.
So I built X2Bridge to close that gap. It's not another chat tool and it's not asking your engineers to change anything — it sits on top of your existing Jira, polls it, and auto-translates ticket status into plain language for the customer. You (the vendor) control exactly what's visible — every comment has a visibility toggle, so internal debugging notes stay internal by default. The customer gets one clean view of their own issues, no Jira seat needed, can reply or drop in a screenshot/log file, and it syncs back into the ticket automatically so engineering isn't checking two places. There's also a release-notes feature — auto-drafted per-customer summaries of what shipped, that you review before sending, with a sign-off/acknowledgment trail you can point to later.
It's live and self-serve: x2bridge
I'd really value your take, especially if the answer is "we don't actually have this problem" or "we solve it a totally different way":
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
the Webflow Source announcement sent me back into Acquia’s Source CMS product guide.
it explicitly says "customers can’t modify the underlying Drupal code or install contributed modules".
I understand the deal: less maintenance responsibility, fewer opportunities to make a beautifully customized disaster.
buttttt Drupal’s flexibility is also why a lot of people chose it.
where does that tradeoff work for you?
for a straightforward marketing site, I can see the appeal. for a project with specific integration or editorial requirements, I’d want to know where the escape hatches are.
what’s the requirement that would make you say “managed SaaS is fine”... or immediately ask for the keys?
I covered the two Sources on my Headless show, but this is the part I’d rather hear from people building and maintaining Drupal sites.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.





Read more of this story at Slashdot.