Hello everybody,

I'm helping customers with specific types of sites (similar to customer portals) which often contain some part of basic functionality and a lot of custom ideas.

My approach is usually 0 code (if I can avoid it).

So I'm really deep inside configuration / modules / etc.

Parts can be easily exported as configurations / recipes.

Some other parts are often quite custom.

Custom views with custom permissions, tags, ECA etc.

I see some customers / people I know just vibe coding everything in Lovable and similar solutions and I'm still clicking around in the admin area.

For the configuration / site building part of Drupal where you configure specific modules etc.:
Do you use any AI?
How to improve building speed there?

(not talking about Canvas landing pages - more features like inquiries, customer dashboards etc.)

Hello everybody,

I'm helping customers with specific types of sites (similar to customer portals) which often contain some part of basic functionality and a lot of custom ideas.

My approach is usually 0 code (if I can avoid it).

So I'm really deep inside configuration / modules / etc.

Parts can be easily exported as configurations / recipes.

Some other parts are often quite custom.

Custom views with custom permissions, tags, ECA etc.

I see some customers / people I know just vibe coding everything in Lovable and similar solutions and I'm still clicking around in the admin area.

For the configuration / site building part of Drupal where you configure specific modules etc.:
Do you use any AI?
How to improve building speed there?

(not talking about Canvas landing pages - more features like inquiries, customer dashboards etc.)

Hello,

with excitement I see several topics around HTMX and it looks real promising!

However, I'm not a developer.
Is it anyhow possible to make use of some small HTMX features with using modules or similar?

Basically, what the title says.
There has been the features module / idea long ago and it worked well to create features via the website directly.

Is something like this for recipes in sight?

Hello,

there are a few different ways to create FAQs as it seems.
In one page / layout builder / node, I'd like to add some FAQ items.
They are directly related to the content of the page.
They should contain the JSON-LD / microformat markup for SEO purposes.

What's your recommendation there?
(without custom development)

Hello,

I've got a content type with a boolean switch: "top".
And I've got two view blocks on one layout builder page.

If on node gets updated now and the the switch is set to off / false, the node should move from the top views block into the bottom views block.

When I reload the page, the views filters kick in and everything is working fine.
Is this possible to do live / right away somehow without reloading the whole page?

Hello,

I've got two content types:
Houses, Flyers

Houses is mostly just address, name - that's it.
Flyers contains media field to upload files and a reference to a house.

So 1 House : n Flyers - Relationship.

Now, I'd like to use the API to retrieve all Flyers with a certain House ID.
I've got the ID, I can see all the Flyers via Postman, when I GET URL/jsonapi/node/flyer
and I can see inside each flyer:

 ... "field_something": "xyz" }, "relationships": { ... "field_house": { "data": { "type": "node--house", "id": "893aa231-e276-4f47-a3c0-efavfdv", "meta": { "drupal_internal__target_id": 960 } }, a aaa 

Somehow, I can filter by all fields inside attributes.
Is it possible to filter by by details inside relationships as well?

When I filter like:

flyer?filter[relationships.field_house.data.id]=893aa231-e276-4f47-a3c0-efavfdv

I get a response:

 "errors": [ { "title": "Bad Request", "status": "400", "detail": "Invalid nested filtering. The field `relationships`, given in the path `relationships.field_house.data.id`, does not exist.", 

I'm building some sort of multi tenant system.
If there is entity A from one company with two registered users, I'd like entity A to be visible to both users.

Currently, I've added a reference field to the users and I'm using views with relationships to show entity A to both users.

But I assume, there is a better / saver way of doing thing?

User C could probably just enter node/42 and see entity A - even though user C is working in another company.

Hi,

let's assume, we have content types like 'my profile' for a community.
Or 'my preferences' for a customer preference center.
Or 'my claims' for an insurance website.
Or 'publish an event' for an event website.

The content type is quite clear - name, multiple fields in the appropriate data types.
However, displaying those content type forms is rather 'ugly'.

I'd like to have a multi page or multi step form. The form should save directly without clicking on save and reload. The inputs should be switches instead of checkboxes, etc.

What I've tried is,

• to use field groups in order to structure the form layout to some extend.
• using field permissions to hide the fields that are being calculated in the background.
• using Conditional Fields where reasonable
• there is a module 'Form Mode Control' which I'm using to show only parts of the form
• using webform to build nice forms and then ECA or Webform Content Creator to create / populate nodes / entities

Are there any better approaches? (no custom development / front-end development)
Are there any good modules that will make data entry for longer forms more bearable?

Hello,

I've got an event content type.
When creating new events, I select the location which is a taxonomy term.
(of both, I've got thousands published already without any issues).

Now I've noticed, that with one particular taxonomy term, I receive a 403 error.

If I remove the selected taxonomy term, I can save the node.
If I use another taxonomy term, I can save the node.
If I switch back to the correct taxonomy term, I see a 403 again.

There is nothing in the error messages under report.

I've tried clearing the cache and I've deactivated JS aggregation for testing - both didn't help.

I've renamed the taxonomy term and that didn't make anything better as well.

Any ideas what it is or how I might find the issue?